tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
A friend on Facebook linked to this article from New York magazine, about how Americans aren't as pro-choice as we'd all like to think. (Warning: somewhat NSFW image on the first page.) It's a thought-provoking article; I take the author's conclusion as being, basically, that pro-choice people ought to spend more time acknowledging the "moral complexity" of the abortion debate.

I couldn't possibly disagree more.

Of all the issues currently up for debate, I see abortion rights as being a pretty simple one. Yes, it may be unclear just when life begins and how much we ought to consider granting any putative rights to fetuses. However, none of that matters. There is nothing that can possibly justify the evil of government forcing women to be pregnant when they don't want to be pregnant. Whatever the harm resulting from destroying fetuses, it cannot exceed the harm to women when the law tells them their bodies aren't their own.

That it even enters into our minds to consider that supposed fetal rights might justify forced pregnancy is evidence that Americans haven't really assimilated the first-class citizenship of women.

This is not to say that the choice to have an abortion, or not, isn't ever difficult for an individual woman. But that's not what the abortion debate is about. The debate is about whether women should have the choice in the first place. Being pro-choice is about respecting the difficulty of that question and acknowledging that all solutions other than leaving it up to the individual woman whose body is at stake are worse than anything that can come of respecting women's autonomy.

Relatedly, I'd love to hear people stop saying that abortion should be safe, legal, and rare. What I'd like to see become rare is women ruining their lives, and quite possibly those of their future children, because the pro-forced-pregnancy movement guilted them into turning a single mistake into a lifetime burden. (And yes, I do believe that much of the supposed emotional ambivalence about abortion is manufactured; advertising can be very effective at manipulating emotions, and to acknowledge that that manipulation exists is not to downplay the intelligence of the manipulated.) Once that's rare, once nobody brings a child into the world out of guilt, maybe then we can work on making abortion rare. Then again, I'm not sure that wouldn't be putting the cart before the horse. Maybe we could work on creating the kind of world where women can carry condoms, or take birth control when they're not in a relationship, without being made to feel like "sluts", and then abortion rates would go down as a side effect. It's just a thought.

When I say that we ought not to concede "moral complexity", I don't mean to say that persuading the public to accept reproductive freedom is going to be simple -- not at all. But that's because persuading the public to accept that women are human beings has never been simple, and won't be simple for a very long time. It's not because whether to force women to give birth is a morally complex question.
If you agree, consider donating to the National Network of Abortion Funds, which -- if done via the link -- will go towards my goal of raising $290 for the NNAF by my birthday! (End of shameless plug. If you don't use Facebook, you can donate to them directly, and that'll be just great too.)
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
An article from Jezebel about the guy who attended my alma mater as an exchange student (emphasis on the past tense, apparently) and proceeded to call the entire campus "whores" would have been great without one line: "boys really can't handle single-sex schools".

I, and the (at least) other two guys who graduated from Wellesley in 2001, handled it just fine. I don't recall ever calling anyone a whore while I was there[*]. Blame Jeremy Pham's behavior on his douchiness -- blaming it on his gender is too easy. This isn't to say that his gender (or rather, his gendered socialization) has nothing to do with his behavior -- just to remark that apparently, even in discussions of men at a women's college, some of us still end up invisible.

[*] except in the "Listen, ho" sort of way [**]
[**] you had to be there
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
"...compared to what women have to sacrifice to feel safe."

A friend linked to this post, from a woman talking about her experiences with constant, lifelong street harassment (and worse) from men. Reading it, I thought, "huh, this doesn't jibe with my experience having been perceived as female for 26 years." It's not that her experiences, or those of lots of women like her, are anything but real -- just, it's never been like this for me and I can't recall any of my female friends ever saying it was bad for them. Maybe I was just never attractive enough to appear on the radar of random male douchebags; sure, there was the time a guy at the beach told me he'd like to spend some time when me when I was 11 standing next to my mom, and the various guys who have driven by in cars while delivering shouted feedback about the amount of hair on my body, and the guy in a Pizza Hut parking lot in Baltimore who (when I was 16) asked me if I had a boyfriend, and when I said yes, asked if that meant I could still date someone else. But I have few enough of those stories that I can itemize them, and I've never feared for my physical safety whether while walking alone in Oakland at night or on a frat house roof deck (not that I've ever been on one anyway).

So I'm curious...
Open to: Access List, detailed results viewable to: Access List, participants: 22

A question for women and people who have been perceived as women at some point: How much do the commenter's experiences resonate with you?

If anything I've gotten *more* harassment and threats than the commenter has.
3 (13.6%)

Yeah, sounds about right.
3 (13.6%)

It's not quite that bad for me, but close.
4 (18.2%)

Sure, I've gotten a few whistles here and there, but nothing remotely like what she talks about.
7 (31.8%)

I have never gotten any such comments or feared for my safety. Maybe I'm wearing an invisible burqa.
0 (0.0%)

I was too lazy to read the comment, but I wanted to click the clicky thing.
1 (4.5%)

I am a cisgender man, and will therefore take this opportunity to practice my listening skills.
4 (18.2%)

tim: Mike Slackernerny thinking "Scientific progress never smelled better" (science)
I think next time I give a talk, I'm going to hold up a baby and say, "This baby doesn't believe in uncertified compilation. This baby wants type safety. This baby doesn't want to use an unverified garbage collector. This baby wants strong guarantees that her reasoning about the code she writes also applies to the code she executes."

Does anyone have a baby I can borrow?
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
Let's remember the deaths of those who believed (at least at some point) that they were dying for their country, which good intentions surpass those of the people who keep the war machine going for profit's sake.

We got a call to write a song about the war in the Gulf,
But we shouldn't hurt anyone's feelings.
So we tried, and gave up, cuz there was no such song,
But the trying was very revealing:

What makes a person so poisonous righteous,
That they'd think less of anyone who just disagrees?
She's just a pacifist, he's just a patriot.
If I said you were crazy, would you have to fight me?

Fighters for liberty,
Fighters for power,
Fighters for longer turns in the shower.

Don't tell me I can't fight 'cause I'll punch out your lights
And history seems to agree
That I would fight you for me.

So we read, and we watched
All the specially selected news,
And we learned so much more about the good guys.

"Won't you stand by the flag?"
Was the question unasked,
"Won't you join in and fight with the allies?"

What could we say? We're only 25 years old,
With 25 sweet summers, and hot fires in the cold.
This kind of life makes that violence unthinkable.
We'd like to play hockey, have kids and grow old.

Fighters for Texaco,
Fighters for power,
Fighters for longer turns in the shower.

Don't tell me I can't fight 'cause I'll punch out your lights,
And history seems to agree
That I would fight you for me,
That us would fight them for we.

He's just a peacenik,
And she's just a war-hawk.
That's where the beach was,
That's where the sea.

What could we say? We're only 25 years old,
And history seems to agree that I would fight you for me,
That us would fight them for we.
Is that how it always will be?

-- Jian Ghomeshi, 1991
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
You know what I could stand never to hear again? Complaints about stupid people, when such complaints are perpetrated by hip 25-to-44-year-old upper-income types.

Yes, I'm aware that I used to more or less build my identity around complaining about stupid people. I'm trying not to do that anymore. I don't want to hear you complaining about how all the world's problems are due to stupid people (or religious people, or people who fail to share some trait that you congratulate yourself about) if all you do is work at a corporate job and play video games. You are not doing the world any favors by merely existing. Your intelligence is of no value to anyone else unless you're using it to help alleviate the suffering of some other human beings. If your life goal is accumulating wealth, you are actually worse than the stupid people you revile.

Relatedly, I really don't want to hear anyone bemoaning how terrible it is that "people like us" (see previously mentioned hip 25-to-44-year-olds) aren't reproducing, while "stupid people are having so many kids". If you would teach your hypothetical kids to drive a Subaru Outback to the grocery store and aspire to a plush defense contracting job, the world is probably actually better off without those kids. If your life more or less amounts to consuming large quantities of consumer electronics and artisan-made waffles, what makes you think your kids are going to be any different?

In summary, shit is not fucked up because of stupid people. Shit is fucked up because of some smart people who are intent on using their power to make sure they get the goodies whether anyone else or not. And it's also fucked up because a lot of very smart people spend their lives keeping the power structure going rather than using their talent to undermine it. Blaming stupid people is a great way for that latter group to vent their frustrations without threatening the former group's power.
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
There's this meme that surfaces now and then that says it's elitist for people in a particular political movement to use vocabulary that goes beyond a "USA Today" sort of level, or to refer to literature... well, I guess to literature. Period.

I've seen the meme show up in the context of feminism, where rich, white women with graduate-level education frequently argue (on the Internet, using expensive computers and broadband connections) that to be more accessible to poor women of color, feminists ought to put down their book larnin' and (I guess) limit themselves to comic strips whose dialogue features words of no more than two syllables.

More recently, it came to my attention that some people dislike the words "cissexual" (describing people whose internal sense of what sex they are matches their external body -- if you've never thought about it, you probably are it) and "cisgender" (describing people whose gender identity matches the one they were assigned at birth -- ditto) because the words originated from a chemistry pun about the prefixes "trans-" and "cis-". Since education is a privilege, by which we mean formal schooling because that's (apparently) the only kind of education, social movements ought not to use words whose meanings aren't obvious -- I guess?

I would perhaps take this kind of argument more seriously if it ever came from a non-privileged person. I have never actually heard anyone complain that they would get involved in a particular movement if only they stopped using big words that were so hard to understand. I have heard plenty of people express concern that *other* (that is, poorer and less white) people might be dissuaded from a movement because of the presence of language or allusions that would be too difficult for such people.

Perhaps it's easy for people who've led comfortable lives to underestimate the amount of initiative and ingenuity it takes to survive as a poor person. I would actually rather write a master's thesis in most humanities or science fields than apply for public benefits, in terms of sheer logistical effort involved. I assume it's also easy for someone who has had the privilege of always seeing their own education as someone else's job to not realize the many ways in which it's possible to educate yourself, sans money, much social support, or other external resources. (You probably have more years of formal schooling under your belt than I do, by the way.)

In fact, the only people who I have ever heard complaining about how oppressive it was for someone else to expect them to have to learn something were privileged white students at the frou-frou college I attended. Sometimes it seems to me like formal schooling and intellectual curiosity are actually negatively correlated.

Going back to the specific example of "cisgender", the reasons for most words' origins are not usually necessary in other to use the words. "Cis" happens to be the Latin prefix for "on this side of", and the mental leap that the coiner of "cisgender" and "cissexual" made from chemists' usage of the prefixes "trans-" and "cis-" is rather immaterial to understanding what the words mean. In general, I don't hear a lot of complaints that psychologists should all be calling themselves "head doctors" because not all people with mental illness know the tale of Cupid and Psyche, or that public transportation is hard to use because "bus" is an abbreviation for "omnibus" and not everyone knows the Latin plural for "all". It's true that "cisgender" is a word that has been in use for much less time than "psychologist" or "bus", but words enter the language through repeated use, not through repeated explanation.

A lot of the work involved in trans inclusion has to do with reframing and with challenging definitions; language does distort reality in a way that's concretely oppressive when someone is unwittingly using a different definitions of "man" (or "woman") than the usual ones when it's convenient to deny that someone is one. So to change reality, you have to change language. Part of that involves using words people may not understand. If everyone's existing vocabulary was adequate, there wouldn't be any work to do.

And that work isn't easy. But the hard part is getting people to challenge their fundamental assumptions; introducing new words is easy. Advertisers do it all the time. You don't do ~underprivileged people~ any favors by claiming you know what's easy or hard for them; if you really ever thought about what life is like for people with less privileged than you, you wouldn't think that looking up a word was a significant barrier to advocating for your own rights.

wow

Oct. 21st, 2009 10:34 am
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
"I am looking for a blender, would prefer that it be black to match the rest of my kitchen, but a working blender would be nice."
-- someone on Freecycle

...

Backups?

Oct. 17th, 2009 03:42 pm
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
Hello interbutts,

Is there a way to back up a Dreamwidth journal automatically, like something similar to what LJ Book does for LiveJournal?

THANKS IN ADVANCE

ETA: LJ Book will in fact do the trick. The one bug I've found is that comments from whoever.livejournal.com will show up with username ext_nnnnn. The developer of LJ book says this is a bug on the Dreamwidth side because that's all the information available from its API.
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 12


For winter break, Tim should go to...

View Answers

Boston area, visit his mom
0 (0.0%)

New York City, get his mom to join him there, assuage guilt while avoiding staying in her apartment in Wellesley
6 (50.0%)

Southern California, go biking, lie on beaches
6 (50.0%)

Eastern Oregon comedy checkbox
3 (25.0%)

Visit me! (Not likely to be effective for non-North-America locations.)
3 (25.0%)

Other
1 (8.3%)

tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
As of yesterday, I have been a graduate student at Portland State for longer than I was a graduate student at Berkeley.

That also means that I've been at Portland State longer than I've had any other job.

Shooting for thesis proposal by my 30th birthday (December 2010) and graduating in 2012, btw.
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
I pose my sempiternal question: how do people back up their computers these days? Now that I have a Mac, I just let Time Machine do its thing. But what if my office catches on fire while my laptop and the backup drive are both in it? Should I have bigger priorities in that case?

Do you use network backups? If so, where do you get your 80 GB of online storage?

Helpful suggestions always appreciated.

propaganda

Oct. 12th, 2009 08:41 am
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
So there's a meme going around that it's not doctors or hospitals (you know, the ones who get richer by providing unnecessary care), but rather, patients who are to blame for the rising cost of health care, because they demand too much medical treatment.

Do you think so? Have you ever demanded care that was above and beyond what you needed? Have you known anyone who went out and got health care just for fun?

Or could it be that convincing people to blame themselves is a powerfully politically disempowering tactic?

I'm listening to an NPR program at the moment talking about how things would be better if people would just trust their doctors, who are currently cowed into submission giving patients the unnecessary and potentially harmful care they demand because insurance won't reimburse them for spending extra time explaining to the patients that it's not necessary, and due to fear of malpractice suits.

But why should you trust someone who puts their fear of losing money ahead of your welfare?
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
A few weeks ago, while reading about Peter Landin, a computer scientist who died recently and was one of the founders of my field of study (programming language theory), I came across an obituary mentioning that Landin was not only openly bisexual, but also was involved in queer activism. This particular fact was omitted from an otherwise excellent memorial talk on Landin that I attended at ICFP 2009.

While following links, I learned that an equally significant researcher, Christopher Strachey, was gay (the fact merits two sentences in an article by M. Campbell-Kelly, "Christopher Strachey, 1916–1975: A Biographical Note" -- sorry, you won't be able to read it unless you happen to have an institutional subscription to the IEEE Annals of the History of Computing), and that during the 1930s, his education was disrupted by a nervous breakdown he suffered that was possibly related to dealing with his homosexuality.

Of course, everybody knows about Alan Turing; when I read about Landin and Strachey, I asked myself "do you have to commit suicide in order to be known as a queer computer scientist?"

I felt as if somebody should have told me that two of the seminal figures in the field I've been working in for the past decade were queer men; I'm not sure who should have told me, or when. But then, I can already hear someone, somewhere asking: "Why should you know, or care? What business is someone else's sexuality?"

Eric Allman, the developer of sendmail (the program that historically has transferred much of Internet email traffic), who's gay, once said, "There is some sort of perverse pleasure in knowing that it's basically impossible to send a piece of hate mail through the Internet without its being touched by a gay program. That's kind of funny." I think that nails it. When you know that something important to you wouldn't exist without the contributions of queer people, it's a bit harder to hate them. The less ability you have to deny that queer people are not "other" but are rather your friends, family and colleagues, the more uncomfortable it is going to be for you to imagine looking at one of them in the eye and explaining why you voted to deny them rights.

Moreover, knowing that a successful person was queer puts their accomplishments in a different light. Knowing that a particular person had to work all that much harder to overcome the shame, guilt and low self-esteem that 20th-century Western culture foisted upon gay and bisexual men makes that person more admirable and creates a feeling of connection, the ability to place oneself in a tradition of people who have struggled and have overcome oppression.

I feel like conventional wisdom is currently saying that queer people have made it: now that we've attained some of the privileges previously reserved for straights, won't we please start acting like them? Not so fast.

I will keep talking about my sexuality in public, because I never chose to make my sexuality a public matter. The people who vote to recognize different relationships differently based on the presumed sexualities of the people involved are the ones who keep my sexuality a public matter. The people who make my ability to board a plane contingent on what set of genitals I have are the ones who keep my sexuality a public matter. Sexuality and reproduction have been matters for public concern forever, and they probably always will be. It's hypocritical to conduct open political debate on the subject of which varieties of sexuality are better than others, and then waggle the invisible finger of social propriety at sexual minority members who dare to engage in that debate by being truthful about themselves.

Who is helped by the taboo against discussing sexuality in public, anyway? I'm not sure that taboos against discussing any kind of sexuality, whether it be gay, bi, non-monogamous, kinky, public, or what have you, actually serve the interests of anybody I'm interested in protecting. What would a world look like where nobody hesitated to be honest about who they are sexually (and when I say "nobody", I mean "nobody" -- queer people aren't the only ones who have closets)? I don't think it would take any of the mystery out of sex; I don't think anything could take the drama and delight out of human relationships. I do think it would make it impossible for any kid growing up to believe that he's the only one who ever liked other boys, or for any kid growing up to believe that she's the only one who ever knew she was a girl despite all appearances to the contrary. Isn't it worth dealing with some discomfort in order to keep those kids away from the pills and sharp objects?

Ultimately, it's not shame about being gay, or bi, or trans, that drives queer people to depression and sometimes suicide. It's the inability to talk about it, and often an accompanying belief that talking about it would keep you out of social life for good. We are truly everywhere, and in 2009, no kid growing up should have to feel they're the only gay or bi or trans person in the world. Maybe what with the advent of the Internet, nobody (in social strata where access to it is ubiquitous, anyway) does believe that anymore. But we're still dangerously close to the time in history where young queer kids believed they were the only one who was like them.

And so although probably everybody who's reading this knows that I'm a transsexual man and that I'm a bisexual person with a moderately strong preference for members of my own gender, I'm saying it again, and I don't intend to let anyone forget it. Happy National Coming Out Day!

What are you coming out as today, and who are you coming out to?
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
""What if it somehow throws off the astrology?"

"What if it somehow throws off the astrology?"

"What if it somehow throws off the astrology????"

Is that like bi?

I... yeah, don't really know what to do with this one.
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
I'm getting rid of more T-shirts that I don't wear often. Some are in good condition, some have minor stains.

Good condition:

  • "Into S&M?" on front; "Science & Math - what were you thinking?" on back. Size M, white text on dark blue shirt. (The Society of Physics Students at Wellesley sold these. I am no longer amused.) - taken by [personal profile] amberite
  • Light gray shirt with "You are dumb" in binary ASCII from ThinkGeek (version 1.0, if you care -- image). Size L. - taken by [livejournal.com profile] jholomorphic
  • "Ask Me About My Penis", white text on black. Size L. (This shirt is only funny if you are presenting as female.)
  • "Serotonin" with diagram of serotonin molecule below. (image - from Purely Akademik.) Dark blue, size L. - taken by [personal profile] amberite
  • "Berkelium" with entry from periodic table. (image - also from Purely Akademik.) Dark blue, size L. - taken by [livejournal.com profile] jholomorphic
  • "Bisexual Pride" in large text, "Biversity Boston/BBWM" below in small text. Pink and blue triangles with rainbow stripes, on black shirt. Size L. - taken by [personal profile] nyecamden
Slightly damaged:

  • "Well-behaved women rarely make history -- Laura [sic] Thatcher Ulrich" on the front, list of Wellesley Alumnae Achievement Awards winners on the back. Light gray, size M. Slight faded stains.
  • "Berkeley" cartoon (the K is a hand holding up a protest sign with a peace sign on it). Light gray, size L. Very faded stains.
  • "GEEKISSEXY" - the KISS is in red and the other letters are white - on a black shirt. Size L. No stains, but my bunnies chewed some holes in the collar area. You could cut that part out if that's your thing. - taken by [personal profile] nyecamden
  • "GOD SAID..." [Maxwell's equations] "...AND THERE WAS LIGHT." Fairly noticeable coffee stain next to text. White, size M. - taken by [livejournal.com profile] jholomorphic
  • "I Got Used at Ned's" (from Ned's Berkeley Bookstore"), some faded stains, white, size L.
I'll send any of these to anyone who asks, for the cost of shipping. First come, first serve.

I'm also giving away a gay pride flag, not the standard rainbow flag, but the version that looks like the American flag but with rainbow stripes instead of red and white. It is an awesome flag, I just don't really have anywhere to hang it. It's a smaller version of this. I'd guess about 3 by 5 feet. - taken by Lance.
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
"A woman engineer is like a pearl in the shell. Treat her carefully, and she will blossom." -- from a reader survey on "what would you tell employers about women engineers?" in a copy of _Woman Engineer_ magazine that was lying around the CS department (no, I'm not making up that magazine title, either).

I guess by the same token, a male engineer is like a quartz crystal, or possibly like a cactus plant?
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
Dear interwebs:

I'd like to know your favorite vegetarian recipe that takes less than 30 minutes (even better if it's less than 20 minutes) to prepare. Go!

edited to clarify: Must be 30 minutes from zero to ready to eat (that is, I'm not distinguishing between active prep time and passive waiting time).
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
On my first day back at work today, I tried taking the Green Line to PSU, ostensibly because I had a lot of heavy stuff to bring to my office, but really because omg MAX directly to PSU.

Timeline:
8:25am: leave my apartment by bike
8:31am: arrive on the platform at Hollywood TC
8:39am: train leaves Hollywood TC
9:04am: train arrives at 5th and Mill
9:08am: I arrive at FAB loading dock
total: 43 minutes
time it would have taken me to bike directly to PSU: 25 minutes

Also, in the worst case (if I'd just barely missed the train), it would have taken me 50 minutes -- twice as long as biking.

On days when I can't bike, it would still be just as fast to take the 19 bus to PSU. MAX traverses downtown so slowly ("transit mall" notwithstanding) as to negate the benefits of higher speed on the east side, combined with it taking 15 minutes longer for me to walk to MAX than to 47th and Glisan.

When are we going to have public transportation that's faster than a bicycle?
tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
I had a layover in Minneapolis, but I didn't see Larry Craig.

The plane from Amsterdam to Minneapolis had individual video screens with video on demand. Despite there being about 60 different movies available, the only one I actually wanted to watch was "Ferris Bueller's Day Off". (I watched it. It was okay, but I think I've now seen enough '80s teen movies for a lifetime. If I feel the need to watch another, I'll just watch "Heathers" again.) I watched the first few minutes each of "State of Play", "Lol" (not kidding), "The Uninvited", and "Two Lovers", all of which seemed crap, before settling on "April Bride" as a second movie. It wasn't bad, but the plane landed about halfway through.

There were also games. There was a trivia game where you could play against other people on the same flight, and it also had an all-time hall of fame with people listed by their seat number and flight number.

Having shown my passport once in Portland, twice in Amsterdam, four times in Bristol, twice in Edinburgh, and once in Minneapolis, I didn't get my gender contested once. So that's good (I guess). This might have been the last time I fly out of or into the US, given recent policy changes.

Now I'm sick, so the quest for a thesis topic will have to wait at least one more day.

Finally, an unrelated random poll )

Profile

tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
Tim Chevalier

November 2021

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags