ext_7286 ([identity profile] catamorphism.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] tim 2008-09-12 05:09 am (UTC)

Sorry, still not buying it:
- Copyright law -- you're saying "things are corrupt because people took a while to start organizing against the corruption", right? So... there was corruption to start with.
- Liability -- perhaps I'd believe this statement if it was just as vigorously supported by labor unions as by corporate lobbyists.
- Health -- if we stopped making *any* advances in medical research and started providing basic and equitable care for everybody, the standard of living would go up. Thus in a sense, we don't need anything that the US has that other countries don't have. (And by "we" I don't mean you or me, I mean the people who actually need health care and aren't getting it.)
- Environment -- crippling industry don't mean a thing if we aren't going to have a place to live 100 years from now (again, not "you" or "me" but...) and of course lives are going to change radically, because the American upper-middle-class way of life is unsustainable. We're certainly not going to figure out what those meaningful environmental regulations might be if we're afraid of those things. And I don't think it's the people who work at 3 shitty jobs to make ends meet and lead miserable lives as it is who are afraid of things changing.

Certainly neither you nor I has the last word, but I am unlikely to be convinced that these are not, to repeat myself, areas of moral certainty.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting