(1) So what you're saying is that you believe NARAL should have an effective advertising budget of $2500 a year? Or are you distinguishing political lobbying groups from corporations in some way that doesn't leave a giant hole?

(2) Where did you respond to the general point about incumbents? You said that we should eliminate the advantages of wealthy challengers by preventing them from limiting their personal campaigning expenditures, and I responded that that simply makes the incumbent problem that much worse.