ext_36143: (Default)
ext_36143 ([identity profile] badasstronaut.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] tim 2006-10-16 02:05 pm (UTC)

Wow. I have lots of thoughts about this kind of thing, and have been having them for a long time. It's so complex that I suspect we could pick it to pieces for ever, and yet I think it's worth doing that forever really.

One thought about that link - doesn't claiming 'geek' in place of 'woman' deny gender power differencess within the group of people who call themselves geeks?

When I was little I desperately wanted to be a little boy. I feel annoyed about that now. I'd taken on some idea that maleness was somehow better. I don't believe that anymore. I think I tried to engage in activities I found less interesting in some cases because I perceived them as masculine. I think I have aspects of myself that might be labelled traditionally masculine and others that might be labelled traditionally feminine, and I expect most people do.

I read someone's journal post a week or so ago about how she felt feminism wasn't relevant for her because gender wasn't high up on her list of ways she defined herself. I said that I thought it was relevant to me for exactly the same reason. For me, feminism should enable me, a woman (because I do regard myself as a woman), to define myself however I like and to value whichever of my characteristics I like regardless of traditional views of gendered characteristics. I think the Stitch&Bitch movement has been a bit like that. People might mock, but it's basically people saying "Fuck you. Knitting's just as pointful a thing to do on a Saturday afternoon as football." And we're right; it is.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting