tim: "System Status: Degraded" (degraded)
[personal profile] tim
Tomorrow is Transgender Day of Remembrance (TDOR). I was debating whether I should write about TDOR, because erica, ascendant and Monica Maldonado have already spoken so much truth on the subject. If you haven't read what they wrote, you should go read it. I'll wait.

The only TDOR event I've attended was two years ago, at Portland State University. To the organizers' credit, Tobi Hill-Meyer was a featured speaker. But other than her speech and showing of her movie, there wasn't a whole lot in the program that was on-topic. What I remember most about the evening was the "genderqueer acrobatics" performance, featuring a number of mostly white youths in furry costumes, cavorting. It didn't seem appropriate for a memorial, any more than a dance party -- which is apparently happening tomorrow as part of more than one city's TDOR event -- is. Do white people jump for joy at the deaths of trans women of color? One might be left thinking so.

I think that part and parcel of this fundamental not getting it is the characterization of violence against trans women of color -- which makes up the overwhelming majority of reported violence against trans and gender-non-conforming people -- as "transphobic violence" or "violence against transgender people".

It's no such thing.

As people like Erica and Monica have already written about, violence against trans women of color is fundamentally violence against women -- specifically, those women who are most vulnerable due to the intersecting oppressions (such as race, poverty, and participation in sex work) they experience. Being trans makes a woman even more vulnerable to violence, because there is no place in the world where law enforcement has much, or any, motivation to investigate a violent crime against a trans woman, particularly a trans woman of color who's not wealthy. It's not that violence against trans women of color happens because of some special kind of violence that's different from run-of-the-mill violence against women because it's rooted in transphobia. It's more indirect: yes, trans women make easier targets, but to understand the real story you have to understand misogyny, racism, poverty -- in other words, the same issues that make cis women vulnerable to violence. Strangely enough, violence (to personify it) seems to be more respectful towards trans women's genders than are the trans men and cis women who often organize events like TDOR. While the latter group seems to need to construct a narrative of transphobia to explain violence against trans women -- so unable are they to see that men commit violence against trans women because they're women -- certain men show that they see trans women as women, by treating them in the same way they treat cis women: only more violent.

When trans men organizing TDOR celebrations talk about the suffering of "transgender people", when academics like Dean Spade make their entire careers off talking about the litany of ways in which "transgender people" are oppressed, they're being wildly misleading. Perhaps not intentionally, in most cases. But it still comes off as self-aggrandizing when college-educated white trans men (like myself!) talk about how they could be killed for being trans, when the worst thing they've ever experienced was someone looking at them funny in the men's room, once.

I don't mean to say that even the most privileged white trans men never face oppression for being trans. Health insurance companies are allowed to deny us needed medical care because we're trans, which affects all but the very richest of us. Many of us can't get government-issued identification that reflects our sexes correctly, which is humiliating if nothing else. I've personally known trans men who had trouble getting employment due to being perceived as trans men. I could go on, but I won't. There are issues that affect all, or almost all, trans people, regardless of their privilege along other axes. And no one should feel that those issues aren't important to work on just because someone, somewhere is suffering more.

So I am totally not opposed to someone working on health insurance discrimination in the US, for example, because that's the issue that moves them, even though having health insurance at all is a privilege many trans people lack. What's wrong, though, is erasing and distracting from the experiences of trans women facing intersecting oppressions by blurring the boundaries with the phrase "transgender people". That phrase groups together trans people who, in fact, profit from white supremacy and unequal distribution of incomes (hello, like me) with trans people who are being profited off, and implies a common set of interest where there is none. The same set of forces that means trans women of color often get the rawest deal even within a particular underclass is the set of forces that allows me to earn a very comfortable living by pressing buttons on a computer all day.

Therefore, for me -- or someone who resembles me -- to go on a stage tomorrow and talk about all the violence that "transgender people" suffer would be wrong. It would be self-aggrandizing. For me to pretend that there is something significant that makes me more similar to a trans woman of color doing sex work and living in poverty than I am to a white cis man running a well-funded Silicon Valley startup would be dishonest. And it would be hard not to see that as a cynical attempt for me to use dead women as instruments to advance a political agenda that -- because it serves the most privileged rather than the least -- isn't really about much other than a self-perpetuating machine of publicity and fundraising.

The rhetorical sleight of hand in grouping all trans people's experience together with the phrase "transgender people" is not just inaccurate and imprecise. It's actively harmful in a way that's very much like the use of "die cis scum" as a rallying cry for some white trans people. The ability to prioritize cis people's oppression of trans people as the most piercing injustice is a reflection of privilege: the privilege of being someone who expects to be in a position to dominate others, but is blocked from being in that position solely by being placed as transsexual and/or transgender. Just as seeing cis people as the only threat is a luxury for those who can rely on white trans people to have their back, garnering sympathy because one could be "killed for being trans" is a privilege reserved for those who can identify a unitary threat to their rightful place of privilege, a single reason why they can't live life at the very lowest difficulty setting.

Clearly, we white trans people (and the cis people who love us) need a common enemy to rally against. But because there's so little violence against us that could reasonably be called "transphobic" (there's a movie called "Boys Don't Cry" because it is indeed so rare for a white trans man to be attacked; if there was a movie about every trans woman of color who met a violent death, there could be an entire category for them on Netflix), it's hard for us to make our movement seem vivid enough to get people interested. Health insurance exclusion clauses, medical gatekeeping, and state bureaus of vital records that refuse to change gender markers on birth certificates are not exactly the stuff of which an attention-getting crusade for justice is made. But the answer isn't to steal stories from people whose lives have inherent value because they were, or are, who they are, as opposed to because a more socially privileged person can use them as an instrument.

What's the harm in all of this? Isn't it always good to raise awareness? But when a group like the Transgender Law Center gives an "Ambassador Award" to Chaz Bono, a man who told the New York Times that testosterone made him feel bored when women were talking, you have to wonder whether ameliorating misogyny matters to self-styled trans activists. (The same group saw it as a priority to help Bono file a legal name change, something that many trans people of more modest means do on their own, without help from a nonprofit.) I think there's a connection between how many groups that claim to be concerned with "LGBT rights", or even with "trans rights", serve mainly the most privileged, and the treatment of trans people's experience as unitary that's exemplified by TDOR and its accompanying rhetoric of "violence against transgender people". The result is a fundamental misdirection of resources. It's been pretty rigorously shown that trickle-down economics doesn't work, and I don't believe that trickle-down social justice works, either.

If it makes you feel good to watch candles being lit and listen to people who look like me mispronounce the last names of people who, well, don't, then it's possible that nothing I've just said will change that. I'm mainly writing this to sort out my thoughts. I've been wanting for a long time to do more than just write about trans activism, to get involved, but I've never been able to see a place to start that clearly does more good than harm. So maybe that's a sign that it would be more effective to work for health care and fair working conditions for everyone, cis people and trans people.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-11-20 09:21 am (UTC)
juli: hill, guardrail, bright blue sky (Default)
From: [personal profile] juli
This is perhaps not as fully-formed of a thought as yours, and I apologize if so. Turning TDoR into a ~celebration of genderdiversity~ is certainly problematic, as is the way that it is used by activists to inflate their own positions. But I think that mourned with appropriate anger it can be good. In my experience, even though the violence does disproportionately target trans women of color, its understanding is seen as a matter of being trans, and not just within the circles of queer activists. When young trans women of color are killed, cis white people will happily sympathize with the attackers and blame the victim on account of the fact that trans people are inherently deceptive, or otherwise on account of their having the audacity to exist while trans. This dehumanization may come more easily when attached to people of color, but I do not think that is exclusive, and I do not think it is beneficial to pretend that that conceptualization of trans people as people who are asking for it is merely an extension of race, or should be neglected in favor of talking in such specificities that the generality cannot be addressed. The fact that TDoR is seen as controversial because it is a "trans thing" is a problem. The fact that being in favor of murder is acceptable in polite company as long as the person is trans is a problem, even if the reality of the people who are murdered can be categorized more limitedly to trans women of color. Even if you can find finer and finer categories to get a closer fit to the violence, the acceptance of the violence on the basis of a set of broader categories must be confronted. I've talked to a few LGB activists about observing TDoR and am met with a suggestion that "people" aren't ready for that. Apparently people aren't ready to consider that murdering a trans person is murdering a person. There has to be instruction and teaching around trans identity, or so I'm told. It does not do violence to trans women of color to confront one of the factors that leads to the social acceptance of their murders by people who might otherwise have the decency to be outraged, but have been coddled by LGB activists who are themselves convinced that trans people are not people. It is, to my mind anyway, not about raising the profile of trans people in general, but about refusing to be silent about tacit and explicit deference to the idea that there are certain ways in which a person may exist which makes it defensible, acceptable or good to kill them.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-11-20 03:36 pm (UTC)
wild_irises: (feminist hulk)
From: [personal profile] wild_irises
For what it's worth, I just quoted erica, mentioned Monica Maldonado, and gave you credit for the pointers, on Body Impolitic. Thanks for the links!

(no subject)

Date: 2012-11-20 05:19 pm (UTC)
ext_36143: (Default)
From: [identity profile] badasstronaut.livejournal.com
Tim, I think this is useful and what's more it's really nicely written x

(no subject)

Date: 2012-11-20 06:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anemone.livejournal.com
I found this is helpful. I've been reading your links related to TDOR, but not quite getting it (perhaps because I haven't seen one in action), and I think I understand better now.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-11-21 07:16 am (UTC)
pastwatcher: (Default)
From: [personal profile] pastwatcher
"certain men show that they see trans women as women, by treating them in the same way they treat cis women: only more violent."

That is an irony I have reflected on a little too often. But anyway, yes. It's trans misogyny, and it's called that for a reason.

I would like to say though, "white trans people" aren't the group that need not be afraid. There may be particular scorn directed at all trans people of color by upper-middle-class people than at white trans people, I would expect more job discrimination, but there is also plenty of harassment and threat of violence directed at white trans women just for being in public. (I've seen a statistic that 98% of all violence against trans people was against trans women and 70% of that was against trans women of color, but I don't know how that was counted or in which countries.) I mean, let me not be self-aggrandizing (ugh), but I have been there alongside for quite a bit of that directed at one friend of mine, and it shakes me. To have seen how scared she was sometimes, and to understand that this fear is based on reality. That at least for me, even though I'm smaller and more apparently vulnerable, I could rely on more people being willing to help me. Not that she's the only one but it was formative. So that aligns rather better with the first part of your essay.
Edited Date: 2012-11-21 07:17 am (UTC)

Also I'm writing this on a bus.

Date: 2012-11-21 05:50 pm (UTC)
luinied: Doing stretches and really not thinking about what's going on in the other room. (idea)
From: [personal profile] luinied
Possibly against my better judgment, this is going to be a comment where I suggest a thing, so I want to note first that I'm well aware that I could be way off base. I've never been part of a trans community anywhere, nor do I have a history of being competent at figuring out what motivates people and using this to good ends. But:

It sounds, from what I've read from you and others and from the one TDOR event I've attended (which did not have a dance party but wasn't entirely on topic) that places that end up having these derailed events are full (relatively speaking) of trans and genderqueer people who want a day to be about them and are appropriating a day that really shouldn't be. So I wonder if clued-in organizers - in places with large enough communities to end up with, like, dance parties - could give these people their own days in such a way as to cleverly discourage TDOR appropriation and even draw more attention to what's really going on with violence against trans women of color.

Say, make November 7th Genderfuck Day, for all the genderqueer acrobatics and whatever, and make November 14th Transgender Awareness Day, when it would be totally appropriate for trans men to talk about the bureaucratic barriers they face and so on. Then on the 21st people might be primed to talk about intersectionality and actually be fittingly solemn, and at the very least anyone's "but what about me?" urges on any of these days should be neutralized by there just having been a day last week that could have been about them.


tim: Tim with short hair, smiling, wearing a black jacket over a white T-shirt (Default)
Tim Chevalier

December 2018

2345 678

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags